Who do you think after sachin's 200* not out??

I don't wanna troll on your thread.

But you can't really compare them.
Entirely different game now and different players.

There's is no point really strting this. Go onto Stick Sprts and they have threads like this were you can talk about this. But after 1 match you can't tell. Statistically you can't judge a player by their stats.

Why does he need to go to SS? This section needs to be used more so people should create threads, however as philly said different time periods so you can compare

This whole thing is gay. All the people that think Sachin is supposedly 'god', and think he is super fantastic, they are all his fellow countrymen. I bet you if you ask every other country around the globe who is better, they will say Bradman.

There done, the don is better, no more, end of disscussion. the end.

Thread needs to be locked I think. Becasue this discussion can get way out of hand.

Well who knows. There will or should be someone who is better than Bradman in years to come.

Bradman played on uncovered pitches, larger boundaries (they played to the fence, not bringing in the rope 5 or 10 m) and blokes bowling over 150 km and Bodyline.

Tendulkar though, has played on highways, smaller boundaries and blokes bowling at over 145 kmph.

Therefore, Bradman is better, in my view.

I'm going to have to agree with points raised by both Wogs and Ducks.

Bradman >>>>>>>> Sachin

And Sumu, link?

Sachin may have 10 times more runs than Bradman, but Sachin has played 20 times more matches than Bradman. But when someone gets picked for their country at 16yo, you know they're going to be a great player. There is no denying that Sachin is a great player, but had Bradman played as many games as Sachin, Bradman would have 10 times more runs and be the greater player.

Really, it's a matter of opinion to who is the best.

Bradman>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sachin

We will nvere know who is better. They're both superb batsmen.

Yeah but Sachin doesnt have an average of 99.96

Yeah that might be so Madman but Sachin ahs played about 100 more games compared to what The Don ahs. So you can't compare them statistically. They played in different eras and they're both superb batsmen.

Look man, Bradman is much better than Sachin. Yes Sachin's played 100 more games than Bradman, but his average isnt even close to Bradmans 99.94 Sachin could be second best but HE IS NOT THE BEST IN THE WORLD And he never will be because people will Always remember Bradman, , THE ULTIMATE LEGEND

Why make the thread then and argue that then Sachin was the best? wtf.